The Effect of the Norman Conquest on Anglo Saxon Gardens

The Effect of the Norman Conquest on Anglo Saxon Gardens The introduction of the Normans in the later half of the eleventh century considerably transformed The Anglo-Saxon ways of living. Effect Norman Conquest Anglo Saxon Gardens 0857827125.jpg

Effect Norman Conquest Anglo Saxon Gardens 0857827125.jpg

The Normans were better than the Anglo-Saxons at architecture and horticulture when they came into power. But before centering on home-life or having the occasion to consider domestic architecture or decoration, the Normans had to subjugate an entire population. Because of this, castles were cruder constructions than monasteries: Monasteries were often important stone buildings located in the biggest and most fecund valleys, while castles were constructed on windy crests where their citizens devoted time and space to tasks for offense and defense. Gardening, a placid occupation, was impracticable in these fruitless fortifications. Berkeley Castle is perhaps the most unchanged model in existence nowadays of the early Anglo-Norman style of architecture. The keep is said to date from William the Conqueror's time. An enormous terrace encompasses the building, serving as an obstruction to assailants wanting to dig under the castle walls. On one of these parapets is a picturesque bowling green covered in grass and surrounded by an aged hedge of yew that has been designed into coarse battlements.

Outdoor Fountains And Their Use In Ancient Minoa

Outdoor Fountains And Their Use In Ancient Minoa On the Greek island of Crete, excavations have unearthed channels of multiple types. They were used for water supply as well as removal of storm water and wastewater. The main components used were rock or terracotta. When clay was employed, it was frequently for channels as well as conduits which came in rectangular or round forms. The cone-like and U-shaped clay pipelines which were discovered have not been spotted in any other civilization. The water availability at Knossos Palace was managed with a system of clay pipes that was put below the floor, at depths going from a few centimeters to many meters. These Minoan pipelines were additionally used for gathering and stocking water, not just distribution. This called for the terracotta pipes to be capable of holding water without seepage. Below ground Water Transportation: At first this particular technique would seem to have been designed not quite for ease but rather to provide water for certain people or rites without it being spotted. Quality Water Transportation: Given the indicators, a number of historians suggest that these conduits were not attached to the common water allocation process, supplying the palace with water from a different source.